HostRETARDIO vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
RETARDIO (Solana) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
RETARDIO vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| RETARDIO | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001765 | $0.4887 |
| Market cap | $1.86M | $11.60M |
| 24h volume | $26.68K | $21.37K |
| Liquidity | $215.68K | $213.78K |
| FDV | $1.86M | $8.18M |
| Holders | 41,539 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | — | 832 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~6.2× the market cap of RETARDIO
- RETARDIO measures ~2.9× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window RETARDIO moved +2.37% while GNS moved +10.7%
What the data says
RETARDIO
RETARDIO is a Solana memecoin in the deliberately-provocative naming tradition. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.9 million across 41,539 wallets on mint 6ogzHhzdrQr9Pgv6hZ2MNze7UrzBMAFyBBWUYp1Fhitx.
Shock-name tokens trade on edginess as brand — the name is the marketing, and it self-limits the audience in equal measure. The holder base is wide for the cap: established community, thin average position.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETARDIO or GNS?
By tracked market cap: RETARDIO (Solana) measures $1.86M and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETARDIO or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: RETARDIO (Solana) grades A and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETARDIO and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show RETARDIO at +2.37% and GNS at +10.7%.
More comparisons
RETARDIO vs ARBJOBCOIN vs RETARDIORETARDIO vs CBZECRETARDIO vs NESTGNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.