HostQUICK vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
QUICK (Polygon) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
QUICK vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| QUICK | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01112 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $6.31M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $19.39K | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $267.93K | $25.55M |
| FDV | $7.39M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 53,996 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 1,439 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~889× the market cap of QUICK
- UNI measures ~95× the liquidity of QUICK
- UNI measures ~265× the 24h volume of QUICK
- UNI measures ~7.1× the holder count of QUICK
- over the shared window QUICK moved +16.2% while UNI moved +6.71%
What the data says
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $6.3 million market cap prices most of the $7.4 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $267.9 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUICK or UNI?
By tracked market cap: QUICK (Polygon) measures $6.31M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUICK or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: QUICK (Polygon) grades A and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUICK and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show QUICK at +16.2% and UNI at +6.71%.
More comparisons
BTR vs QUICKQUICK vs INJQUICK vs GMONUSDUC vs QUICKUNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.