HostQUICK vs GMON — price, size and safety, side by side
QUICK (Polygon) vs GMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
QUICK vs GMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| QUICK | GMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01112 | $0.02928 |
| Market cap | $6.31M | $1.84M |
| 24h volume | $19.39K | $196.15 |
| Liquidity | $267.93K | $266.50K |
| FDV | $7.39M | $999.46K |
| Holders | 53,996 | 5,748 |
| Age (days) | 1,439 | 293 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- QUICK measures ~3.4× the market cap of GMON
- QUICK measures ~99× the 24h volume of GMON
- QUICK measures ~9.4× the holder count of GMON
- over the shared window QUICK moved +16.2% while GMON moved +2.96%
What the data says
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $6.3 million market cap prices most of the $7.4 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $267.9 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GMON
gMON at 0x8498312a6b3cbd158bf0c93abdcf29e6e4f55081 is a Monad liquid-staking receipt — the yield-bearing claim on staked MON — 293 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $1.8 million market cap sits above a $999.5 thousand fully-diluted figure on 38.3 million units.
The book is deep for the slice: $266.5 thousand of tracked depth against a $196 daily volume — receipts like this do their real mint-and-redeem through the staking contract, leaving the pool for marginal flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUICK or GMON?
By tracked market cap: QUICK (Polygon) measures $6.31M and GMON (Monad) measures $1.84M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUICK or GMON?
On the contract checks we publish: QUICK (Polygon) grades A and GMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUICK and GMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show QUICK at +16.2% and GMON at +2.96%.
More comparisons
BTR vs QUICKQUICK vs INJUSDUC vs QUICKQUICK vs NESINJ vs GMONBTR vs GMONGMON vs NESGMON vs MEBT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.