HostGMON vs MEBT — price, size and safety, side by side
GMON (Monad) vs MEBT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
GMON vs MEBT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GMON | MEBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02928 | $3.08 |
| Market cap | $1.84M | $4.23M |
| 24h volume | $196.15 | $117.54K |
| Liquidity | $266.50K | $263.02K |
| FDV | $999.46K | $4.20M |
| Holders | 5,748 | 6,886 |
| Age (days) | 293 | 108 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~2.3× the market cap of GMON
- MEBT measures ~599× the 24h volume of GMON
What the data says
GMON
gMON at 0x8498312a6b3cbd158bf0c93abdcf29e6e4f55081 is a Monad liquid-staking receipt — the yield-bearing claim on staked MON — 293 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $1.8 million market cap sits above a $999.5 thousand fully-diluted figure on 38.3 million units.
The book is deep for the slice: $266.5 thousand of tracked depth against a $196 daily volume — receipts like this do their real mint-and-redeem through the staking contract, leaving the pool for marginal flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMON or MEBT?
By tracked market cap: GMON (Monad) measures $1.84M and MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMON or MEBT?
On the contract checks we publish: GMON (Monad) grades B and MEBT (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMON and MEBT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GMON at +2.96% and MEBT at +1.40%.
More comparisons
INJ vs GMONQUICK vs GMONBTR vs GMONGMON vs NESMEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.