HostNES vs MEBT — price, size and safety, side by side
NES (Ethereum) vs MEBT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
NES vs MEBT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| NES | MEBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005341 | $3.08 |
| Market cap | $75.57K | $4.23M |
| 24h volume | $71.64 | $117.54K |
| Liquidity | $264.63K | $263.02K |
| FDV | $111.63K | $4.20M |
| Holders | 28,890 | 6,886 |
| Age (days) | 50 | 108 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~56× the market cap of NES
- MEBT measures ~1,641× the 24h volume of NES
- NES measures ~4.2× the holder count of MEBT
- over the shared window NES moved −99.8% while MEBT moved −0.10%
What the data says
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our September 27, 2026 read shows $265 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NES or MEBT?
By tracked market cap: NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K and MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NES or MEBT?
On the contract checks we publish: NES (Ethereum) grades B and MEBT (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NES and MEBT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show NES at −99.8% and MEBT at −0.10%.
More comparisons
GMON vs NESNES vs CLAWINJ vs NESQUICK vs NESMEBT vs CLAWMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTYMEBT vs ERC20
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.