HostMEBT vs ERC20 — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs ERC20 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
MEBT vs ERC20 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| MEBT | ERC20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.08 | $0.000000006729 |
| Market cap | $4.23M | $592 |
| 24h volume | $117.54K | $963.75K |
| Liquidity | $263.02K | $259.65K |
| FDV | $4.20M | $13.44B |
| Holders | 6,886 | 8,688 |
| Age (days) | 108 | 213 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~7,144× the market cap of ERC20
- ERC20 measures ~8.2× the 24h volume of MEBT
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
ERC20
ERC20 — a token literally named "ERC20" on BNB Chain at 0x58730ae0faa10d73b0cddb5e7b87c3594f7a20cb — carries the most extreme valuation split in this batch: a market cap of $592 against a fully diluted figure of $13.4 billion on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A $13.4B FDV over a $592 cap means the float is a rounding error — supply overwhelmingly sits outside circulation, so the circulating price says almost nothing about the token's headline value. The contract can mint on top of that, the top ten wallets hold about 76.3%, and even so 8,688 wallets hold positions — with $259.6 thousand of tracked depth, more book than the cap itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or ERC20?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M and ERC20 (BNB Chain) measures $592 — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or ERC20?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and ERC20 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and ERC20 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show MEBT at 0.00% and ERC20 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTYKITTY vs ERC20BEE vs ERC20CLAW vs ERC20ERC20 vs NODAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.