HostERC20 vs NODAL — price, size and safety, side by side
ERC20 (BNB Chain) vs NODAL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ERC20 vs NODAL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| ERC20 | NODAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000000006729 | $0.003271 |
| Market cap | $592 | $1.40M |
| 24h volume | $963.75K | $35.78K |
| Liquidity | $259.65K | $255.81K |
| FDV | $13.44B | $33.85M |
| Holders | 8,688 | 3,459 |
| Age (days) | 213 | 97 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- NODAL measures ~2,370× the market cap of ERC20
- ERC20 measures ~27× the 24h volume of NODAL
- ERC20 measures ~2.5× the holder count of NODAL
What the data says
ERC20
ERC20 — a token literally named "ERC20" on BNB Chain at 0x58730ae0faa10d73b0cddb5e7b87c3594f7a20cb — carries the most extreme valuation split in this batch: a market cap of $592 against a fully diluted figure of $13.4 billion on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A $13.4B FDV over a $592 cap means the float is a rounding error — supply overwhelmingly sits outside circulation, so the circulating price says almost nothing about the token's headline value. The contract can mint on top of that, the top ten wallets hold about 76.3%, and even so 8,688 wallets hold positions — with $259.6 thousand of tracked depth, more book than the cap itself.
NODAL
NODAL at 0x1bf6634969eb3877759d31eefe60b974e57a8b28 is a 97-day-old Polygon book priced at a $1.4 million market cap against a $33.8 million fully-diluted figure on 10.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot — barely one part in twenty-five of the total claim is priced float.
The book is deep for the cap it currently serves: $255.8 thousand of tracked depth on $35.8 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ERC20 or NODAL?
By tracked market cap: ERC20 (BNB Chain) measures $592 and NODAL (Polygon) measures $1.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ERC20 or NODAL?
On the contract checks we publish: ERC20 (BNB Chain) grades B and NODAL (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ERC20 and NODAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show ERC20 at 0.00% and NODAL at −3.36%.
More comparisons
KITTY vs ERC20BEE vs ERC20CLAW vs ERC20MEBT vs ERC20NODAL vs CYBERLEEKNODAL vs QINODAL vs STRCXKITTY vs NODAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.