HostGMON vs NES — price, size and safety, side by side
GMON (Monad) vs NES (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
GMON vs NES — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GMON | NES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02928 | $0.0005341 |
| Market cap | $1.84M | $75.57K |
| 24h volume | $196.15 | $71.64 |
| Liquidity | $266.50K | $264.63K |
| FDV | $999.46K | $111.63K |
| Holders | 5,748 | 28,890 |
| Age (days) | 293 | 50 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GMON measures ~24× the market cap of NES
- GMON measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of NES
- NES measures ~5.0× the holder count of GMON
What the data says
GMON
gMON at 0x8498312a6b3cbd158bf0c93abdcf29e6e4f55081 is a Monad liquid-staking receipt — the yield-bearing claim on staked MON — 293 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $1.8 million market cap sits above a $999.5 thousand fully-diluted figure on 38.3 million units.
The book is deep for the slice: $266.5 thousand of tracked depth against a $196 daily volume — receipts like this do their real mint-and-redeem through the staking contract, leaving the pool for marginal flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our September 27, 2026 read shows $265 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMON or NES?
By tracked market cap: GMON (Monad) measures $1.84M and NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMON or NES?
On the contract checks we publish: GMON (Monad) grades B and NES (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMON and NES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GMON at +2.96% and NES at 0.00%.
More comparisons
INJ vs GMONQUICK vs GMONBTR vs GMONGMON vs MEBTNES vs MEBTNES vs CLAWINJ vs NESQUICK vs NES
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.