HostNVDAB vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
NVDAB (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
NVDAB vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NVDAB | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $224.84 | $0.1034 |
| Market cap | $31.11M | $255.30M |
| 24h volume | $3.52M | $6.84M |
| Liquidity | $2.59M | $2.46M |
| FDV | $31.11M | $255.30M |
| Holders | 130,021 | 90,082 |
| Age (days) | 54 | 206 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~8.2× the market cap of NVDAB
- 龙虾 measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of NVDAB
- over the shared window NVDAB moved +0.04% while 龙虾 moved −60.1%
What the data says
NVDAB
NVDAB at 0x02fca66c1d1afb4e2a7884261eb00f63598a7436 — deployed under the name "NVIDIA Corp" — is a BNB Chain asset 54 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $31.1 million market cap across a 138.4 thousand supply.
The borrowed equity name carries no affiliation by itself — the page's first job on a corporate-themed token is to say that plainly and print the address that actually identifies the contract. The book underneath is real: $2.6 million of deep tracked depth on $3.5 million of 24-hour volume, a tape that turns over more than the pool daily.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NVDAB or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: NVDAB (BNB Chain) measures $31.11M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NVDAB or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: NVDAB (BNB Chain) grades B and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NVDAB and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NVDAB at +0.04% and 龙虾 at −60.1%.
More comparisons
NVDAB vs TFUSDNVDAB vs USDXSYRUPUSDC vs NVDABGMX vs NVDAB龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.