HostNADS vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
NADS (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
NADS vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NADS | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003777 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $35.08K | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $90.68 | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $8.44K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $35.08K | $3.20K |
| Holders | 3,459 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NADS measures ~10.0× the market cap of MCA
- NADS measures ~3.7× the liquidity of MCA
- MCA measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of NADS
- over the shared window NADS moved 0.00% while MCA moved +9.69%
What the data says
NADS
The contract behind NADS is about as reassuring as they come. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's why NADS sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-09-26 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Here's where NADS stands today: a $8.44K pool, a holder base of 3,459 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $8.44K pool stands up well to a ~$35.08K cap — depth like that means NADS absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 3,459 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NADS or MCA?
By tracked market cap: NADS (Monad) measures $35.08K and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NADS or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: NADS (Monad) grades A and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NADS and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NADS at 0.00% and MCA at +9.69%.
More comparisons
HELIO vs NADSNADS vs YELPENADS vs HACKERBORGY vs NADSMCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.