HostNADS vs HACKER — price, size and safety, side by side
NADS (Monad) vs HACKER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
NADS vs HACKER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NADS | HACKER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003777 | $0.00001371 |
| Market cap | $35.08K | $13.65K |
| 24h volume | $90.68 | $92.51 |
| Liquidity | $8.44K | $8.35K |
| FDV | $35.08K | $13.65K |
| Holders | 3,459 | 1,633 |
| Age (days) | 298 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NADS measures ~2.6× the market cap of HACKER
- NADS measures ~2.1× the holder count of HACKER
- over the shared window NADS moved +7.67% while HACKER moved −3.47%
What the data says
NADS
The contract behind NADS is about as reassuring as they come. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's why NADS sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-09-26 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Here's where NADS stands today: a $8.44K pool, a holder base of 3,459 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $8.44K pool stands up well to a ~$35.08K cap — depth like that means NADS absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 3,459 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
HACKER
HACKER — "capital killer" on Solana, mint TVKv96p5SD93veeWTZzppv17r867ij6tmnDpUhZpump — is a pump.fun file — a live site at https://x.com/i/communities/2004819960112263211, holding 1,633 wallets on a $13.7 thousand cap.
Mint and freeze are both revoked on a $7.0 thousand pool.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NADS or HACKER?
By tracked market cap: NADS (Monad) measures $35.08K and HACKER (Solana) measures $13.65K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NADS or HACKER?
On the contract checks we publish: NADS (Monad) grades A and HACKER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NADS and HACKER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NADS at +7.67% and HACKER at −3.47%.
More comparisons
HELIO vs NADSNADS vs YELPEBORGY vs NADSNADS vs KARMAYELPE vs HACKERHACKER vs KARMAHELIO vs HACKERHACKER vs BELKA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.