HostMEBT vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
MEBT vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MEBT | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.08 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $4.23M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $117.54K | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $263.02K | $25.55M |
| FDV | $4.20M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 6,886 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 108 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~1,325× the market cap of MEBT
- UNI measures ~97× the liquidity of MEBT
- UNI measures ~44× the 24h volume of MEBT
- UNI measures ~55× the holder count of MEBT
- over the shared window MEBT moved +1.40% while UNI moved +6.71%
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or UNI?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MEBT at +1.40% and UNI at +6.71%.
More comparisons
MEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTYUNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.