HostLOOK vs EAT — price, size and safety, side by side
LOOK (Solana) vs EAT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LOOK vs EAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| LOOK | EAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00006446 | $0.003912 |
| Market cap | $64.92K | $3.82M |
| 24h volume | $0.5572 | $1.02K |
| Liquidity | $28.55K | $28.24K |
| FDV | $64.92K | $3.82M |
| Holders | 3,787 | 15,235 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EAT measures ~59× the market cap of LOOK
- EAT measures ~1,833× the 24h volume of LOOK
- EAT measures ~4.0× the holder count of LOOK
- over the shared window LOOK moved +5.53% while EAT moved −4.41%
What the data says
LOOK
LOOK — "Look bro..." on Solana, mint BSqMUYb6ePwKsby85zrXaDa4SNf6AgZ9YfA2c4mZpump — is a phrase-token — "look bro" as the opening of every cope reply — with a deeper pool than its tier: $29 thousand against a $65 thousand cap in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The shape is unusual: a 44% liquidity-to-cap ratio is deep for this tier — most tokens here run 10-30%. 3,787 holders on ~$14 of cap per wallet is a mid file; ~$2 of daily volume is a dead book on a −2.1% day. Mint and freeze revoked.
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $28 thousand of liquidity and 15,235 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LOOK or EAT?
By tracked market cap: LOOK (Solana) measures $64.92K and EAT (Solana) measures $3.82M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LOOK or EAT?
On the contract checks we publish: LOOK (Solana) grades A and EAT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LOOK and EAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show LOOK at +5.53% and EAT at −4.41%.
More comparisons
LOOK vs SWARMUUSD vs LOOKSPORE vs LOOKLOOK vs QTOEAT vs NOMEAT vs LOOBYEAT vs FEBUVIDAX vs EAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.