HostLAVA vs SQD — price, size and safety, side by side
LAVA (Arbitrum) vs SQD (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LAVA vs SQD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| LAVA | SQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01349 | $0.03036 |
| Market cap | $8.18M | $39.68M |
| 24h volume | $13.56K | $3.38K |
| Liquidity | $331.36K | $226.13K |
| FDV | $2.75M | $40.29M |
| Holders | 4,745 | 17,095 |
| Age (days) | 286 | 809 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- SQD measures ~4.8× the market cap of LAVA
- LAVA measures ~4.0× the 24h volume of SQD
- SQD measures ~3.6× the holder count of LAVA
- over the shared window LAVA moved −1.44% while SQD moved +9.22%
What the data says
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 million market cap sits above the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $331.4 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LAVA or SQD?
By tracked market cap: LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $8.18M and SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LAVA or SQD?
On the contract checks we publish: LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C and SQD (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LAVA and SQD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show LAVA at −1.44% and SQD at +9.22%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs LAVALAVA vs XBTLAVA vs MSUSDLVMON vs LAVAUNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.