HostGNS vs WEETH — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs WEETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
GNS vs WEETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GNS | WEETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $2.97K |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $5.89B |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $532.17K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $14.39M |
| FDV | $8.18M | $5.89B |
| Holders | 14,134 | 28,590 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 990 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~508× the market cap of GNS
- WEETH measures ~67× the liquidity of GNS
- WEETH measures ~25× the 24h volume of GNS
- WEETH measures ~2.0× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +9.30% while WEETH moved −0.94%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $14.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or WEETH?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and WEETH (Ethereum) measures $5.89B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or WEETH?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and WEETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and WEETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GNS at +9.30% and WEETH at −0.94%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSWEETH vs UWEETH vs USDCWEETH vs AGXUSDE vs WEETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.