HostGNS vs SOL — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs SOL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNS vs SOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GNS | SOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $121.60 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $70.79B |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $4.48B |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $959.88M |
| FDV | $8.18M | $76.46B |
| Holders | 14,134 | 3,820,662 |
| Age (days) | 832 | — |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- SOL measures ~6,101× the market cap of GNS
- SOL measures ~4,490× the liquidity of GNS
- SOL measures ~209,505× the 24h volume of GNS
- SOL measures ~270× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +10.7% while SOL moved +2.23%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
SOL
Wrapped SOL is the one token on this site that is barely a token at all. SOL itself — the coin that pays for every transaction on Solana — is not an SPL token, so any program that expects the SPL standard works with this wrapper instead: one wSOL always represents one SOL, held in a token account you can unwrap back to native SOL at any moment. When a DEX route, a lending pool, or a liquidity pair says "SOL," this mint — So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 — is almost always what it means under the hood.
The safety read here is about as clean as the format allows, and for a structural reason rather than a flattering one. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot both the mint authority and the freeze authority read revoked: nobody can print unbacked wSOL, and nobody can freeze a wallet's balance. That isn't a team making good choices — it's baked into how the wrapper works, which is exactly why wrapped SOL is the reference point other tokens get measured against. The snapshot puts roughly 3.82 million holders on the mint and about $960 million of tracked liquidity, numbers no ordinary SPL token approaches.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or SOL?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and SOL (Solana) measures $70.79B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or SOL?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and SOL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and SOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GNS at +10.7% and SOL at +2.23%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSSOL vs WETHSOL vs WBNBSOL vs USDTUSDC vs SOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.