HostGNS vs SHACK — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs SHACK (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNS vs SHACK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| GNS | SHACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $0.001115 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $1.04M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $24.58K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $40.68K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $1.04M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 2,340 |
| Age (days) | 832 | — |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~11× the market cap of SHACK
- GNS measures ~5.3× the liquidity of SHACK
- GNS measures ~6.0× the holder count of SHACK
- over the shared window GNS moved +10.7% while SHACK moved −22.8%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
SHACK
Shack Token — SHACK — a Solana community token at mint BHvPQ9dFAiZJUSYJFpEmdfMmgz48iLohyxyixBfZjups. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $41 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,340 holders.
A mid-cap community token — real pool, moderate holder base, meme economics: the value is the brand and the community behind it, nothing underneath paying out.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or SHACK?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and SHACK (Solana) measures $1.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or SHACK?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and SHACK (Solana) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and SHACK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show GNS at +10.7% and SHACK at −22.8%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSSHACK vs HBULLSHACK vs LANDLORDTOESCOIN vs SHACKSHACK vs MONK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.