HostGNS vs ETHFI — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs ETHFI (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNS vs ETHFI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GNS | ETHFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $0.7507 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $724.73M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $70.41K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $204.18K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $5.64M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 23,598 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 6 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- ETHFI measures ~62× the market cap of GNS
- ETHFI measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of GNS
- ETHFI measures ~1.7× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +10.7% while ETHFI moved −0.39%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
ETHFI
ETHFI at 0x7189fb5b6504bbff6a852b13b7b82a3c118fdc27 is ether.fi's governance token on Arbitrum — a record only six days old at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, one of the youngest books in the tracked corpus. The asset-wide $724.7 million market cap towers over the $5.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 7.5 million local units.
The week-old book is thin but trading: $204.2 thousand of tracked depth on $58.2 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or ETHFI?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and ETHFI (Arbitrum) measures $724.73M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or ETHFI?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and ETHFI (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and ETHFI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GNS at +10.7% and ETHFI at −0.39%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSETHFI vs STNKCLASH vs ETHFIBILLY vs ETHFIETHFI vs LV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.