HostGNS vs A — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs A (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNS vs A — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GNS | A | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $0.9808 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $161.38M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $130.96K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $29.93K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $151.16M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 356,119 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 453 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- A measures ~14× the market cap of GNS
- GNS measures ~7.1× the liquidity of A
- A measures ~6.1× the 24h volume of GNS
- A measures ~25× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +10.7% while A moved −1.20%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
A
A — a token literally named "A" — is a 453-day-old Polygon deployment at 0x6631ee651da438db2be611b5a44dfe2ca04590c5, priced at a $161.4 million market cap on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The gap is the read: a $161M headline on $29.9 thousand of tracked liquidity — a nine-figure mark resting on a five-figure book, where the last trade writes the price. Daily volume of $60.4 thousand churns that thin pool over twice. Contract controls were not assessed and holder distribution was not resolved.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or A?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and A (Polygon) measures $161.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or A?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and A (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and A performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GNS at +10.7% and A at −1.20%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSDRUGS vs ACOBY vs AELGATO vs ATOADS vs A
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.