NexFET vs PYTH — price, size and safety, side by side
FET (Ethereum) vs PYTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-15.
FET vs PYTH — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| FET | PYTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1464 | $0.05569 |
| Market cap | $353.60M | $519.85M |
| 24h volume | $77.29M all venues | $25.27M all venues |
| Liquidity | $573.85K | $437.44K |
| FDV | $415.23M | $660.13M |
| Holders | 165,300 | 307,701 |
| Age (days) | 1,388 | — |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- FET measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of PYTH
- PYTH measures ~1.9× the holder count of FET
- over the shared window FET moved −38.7% while PYTH moved −21.2%
What the data says
FET
FET — 0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85 — is Fetch.ai's token, mid-merger: Fetch, SingularityNET and Ocean Protocol are combining into the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI), with FET as the merge's surviving ticker at the first stage. Holding this contract today means holding an asset whose own alliance is re-denominating it — liquidity, branding and mindshare are all in transit.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $353.6 million market cap against an $415.2 million FDV — most supply circulating — with $574 thousand of tracked pool depth and 165,300 holders. Workable depth for a mid-cap, though the market's real center of gravity sits on centralized venues during the migration.
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the November 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $519.9 million of market capitalization across 307,701 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $437 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FET or PYTH?
By tracked market cap: FET (Ethereum) measures $353.60M and PYTH (Solana) measures $519.85M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FET or PYTH?
On the contract checks we publish: FET (Ethereum) grades D and PYTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FET and PYTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show FET at −38.7% and PYTH at −21.2%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs FETHLX vs FETFET vs STABLEUSDC.E vs FETPYTH vs MONSTABLE vs PYTHPYTH vs CRVPYTH vs GOHOME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.