NexUSDC.E vs FET — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC.E (Gnosis) vs FET (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-12.
USDC.E vs FET — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| USDC.E | FET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.997 | $0.1464 |
| Market cap | $8.54M | $353.60M |
| 24h volume | $1.32M DEX | $77.29M all venues |
| Liquidity | $3.00M | $573.85K |
| FDV | $8.61M | $415.23M |
| Holders | 7,909 | 165,300 |
| Age (days) | 521 | 1,388 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- FET measures ~41× the market cap of USDC.E
- USDC.E measures ~5.2× the liquidity of FET
- FET measures ~59× the 24h volume of USDC.E
- FET measures ~21× the holder count of USDC.E
- over the shared window USDC.E moved −0.17% while FET moved −33.7%
What the data says
USDC.E
One detail on USDC.E didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, USDC.E carries $3.18M of on-chain liquidity, 7,909 wallets holding and an established record at 521 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $9.84M in market cap, the $3.18M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 7,909-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of USDC.E as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FET
FET — 0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85 — is Fetch.ai's token, mid-merger: Fetch, SingularityNET and Ocean Protocol are combining into the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI), with FET as the merge's surviving ticker at the first stage. Holding this contract today means holding an asset whose own alliance is re-denominating it — liquidity, branding and mindshare are all in transit.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $353.6 million market cap against an $415.2 million FDV — most supply circulating — with $574 thousand of tracked pool depth and 165,300 holders. Workable depth for a mid-cap, though the market's real center of gravity sits on centralized venues during the migration.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC.E or FET?
By tracked market cap: USDC.E (Gnosis) measures $8.54M and FET (Ethereum) measures $353.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC.E or FET?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC.E (Gnosis) grades B and FET (Ethereum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC.E and FET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show USDC.E at −0.17% and FET at −33.7%.
More comparisons
USDC.E vs ARBASTER vs USDC.EXRP vs USDC.EDRV vs USDC.EWBTC vs FETHLX vs FETFET vs STABLEFET vs PYTH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.