NexPYTH vs MON — price, size and safety, side by side
PYTH (Solana) vs MON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
PYTH vs MON — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| PYTH | MON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05569 | $0.01601 |
| Market cap | $519.85M | $2.46B |
| 24h volume | $25.27M all venues | $15.87M all venues |
| Liquidity | $437.44K | $411.07K |
| FDV | $660.13M | $1.69B |
| Holders | 307,701 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 323 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MON measures ~4.7× the market cap of PYTH
- PYTH measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of MON
- over the shared window PYTH moved +5.99% while MON moved −25.4%
What the data says
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the November 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $519.9 million of market capitalization across 307,701 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $437 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
MON
This row tracks MON — Monad's native token — under the all-zeroes placeholder 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 that DEX data uses for a chain's native asset. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $411 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest definitional note is the same as on ethereum and arbitrum: MON is the chain's native asset, so there is no mint contract to audit — the checks on this page describe the pools it trades against, not the token. What MON is worth is a question about whether Monad's parallel-EVM thesis (Solana-class speed on EVM semantics) wins real orderflow — the row measures the pools, not the thesis.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PYTH or MON?
By tracked market cap: PYTH (Solana) measures $519.85M and MON (Monad) measures $2.46B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PYTH or MON?
On the contract checks we publish: PYTH (Solana) grades A and MON (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PYTH and MON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show PYTH at +5.99% and MON at −25.4%.
More comparisons
STABLE vs PYTHPYTH vs CRVPYTH vs GOHOMEPYTH vs VIRTUALMON vs CRVSTABLE vs MONMON vs GOHOMEMON vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.