NexMON vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
MON (Monad) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-12.
MON vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-28 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| MON | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01601 | $0.2376 |
| Market cap | $2.46B | $416.06M |
| 24h volume | $15.87M all venues | $47.95M all venues |
| Liquidity | $411.07K | $8.70M |
| FDV | $1.69B | $638.63M |
| Holders | — | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | 323 | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- MON measures ~5.9× the market cap of CRV
- CRV measures ~21× the liquidity of MON
- CRV measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of MON
- over the shared window MON moved −37.5% while CRV moved −30.9%
What the data says
MON
This row tracks MON — Monad's native token — under the all-zeroes placeholder 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 that DEX data uses for a chain's native asset. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $411 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest definitional note is the same as on ethereum and arbitrum: MON is the chain's native asset, so there is no mint contract to audit — the checks on this page describe the pools it trades against, not the token. What MON is worth is a question about whether Monad's parallel-EVM thesis (Solana-class speed on EVM semantics) wins real orderflow — the row measures the pools, not the thesis.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $416.1 million market cap against an $638.6 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $8.7 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MON or CRV?
By tracked market cap: MON (Monad) measures $2.46B and CRV (Ethereum) measures $416.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MON or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: MON (Monad) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MON and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-28 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show MON at −37.5% and CRV at −30.9%.
More comparisons
PYTH vs MONSTABLE vs MONMON vs GOHOMEMON vs VIRTUALCRV vs SKYSUSDAI vs CRVUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs KBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-28→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.