HostESP vs LPT — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs LPT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ESP vs LPT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| ESP | LPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1052 | $1.79 |
| Market cap | $71.56M | $88.84M |
| 24h volume | $542.49K | $93.89K |
| Liquidity | $129.54K | $102.51K |
| FDV | $7.86M | $67.28M |
| Holders | 3,284 | 260,162 |
| Age (days) | 222 | 1,669 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~5.8× the 24h volume of LPT
- LPT measures ~79× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window ESP moved +10.1% while LPT moved +5.03%
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $130 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
LPT
LPT at 0x289ba1701c2f088cf0faf8b3705246331cb8a839 — Livepeer Token — is the Arbitrum deployment of the video-transcoding network's work asset, 1,669 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. Unusually, most of the measured float lives here: the $67.3 million fully-diluted figure on 37.5 million local units is three-quarters of the asset-wide $88.8 million market cap.
The book is thin for the slice and the tape outruns it: $102.5 thousand of tracked depth on $119.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover above the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or LPT?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $71.56M and LPT (Arbitrum) measures $88.84M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or LPT?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and LPT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and LPT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show ESP at +10.1% and LPT at +5.03%.
More comparisons
ESP vs KETESP vs EVAABMT vs ESPESP vs ALTSZNSNAP vs LPTLPT vs KINSLPT vs ANONLPT vs AVB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.