HostCRV vs TRUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs TRUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CRV vs TRUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| CRV | TRUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3436 | $0.9987 |
| Market cap | $539.21M | $72.95M |
| 24h volume | $633.85K | $692.53K |
| Liquidity | $10.48M | $9.45M |
| FDV | $831.96M | $72.95M |
| Holders | 100,872 | 470 |
| Age (days) | — | 25 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~7.4× the market cap of TRUSD
- CRV measures ~215× the holder count of TRUSD
What the data says
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
TRUSD
trUSD is a smaller fiat-backed dollar — the stablecoin of a modest issuer in a field where the top three names control almost everything. The deployment 0xd0580192e98ea6ceb9c7b6191ed2e27560911697 is the Ethereum mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $9.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing for a small stable is different than for a small token: a stablecoin's entire product is trust — attestations, redemption rails, reserve quality — and scale is how that trust gets battle-tested. trUSD's depth is real but the asset class it competes in is one where the incumbents' attestations have been inspected for years and a minor issuer's haven't.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or TRUSD?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M and TRUSD (Ethereum) measures $72.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or TRUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and TRUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and TRUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show CRV at 0.00% and TRUSD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAIUSDC vs TRUSDOPENAI vs TRUSD牛来 vs TRUSD牛来 vs TRUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.