HostCHIP vs GOHM — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs GOHM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
CHIP vs GOHM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CHIP | GOHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05009 | $5.53K |
| Market cap | $98.75M | — |
| 24h volume | $810.21K | $3.54K |
| Liquidity | $470.85K | $116.22K |
| FDV | $493.74M | $3.42M |
| Holders | 5,600 | 7,457 |
| Age (days) | 153 | 1,758 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~4.1× the liquidity of GOHM
- CHIP measures ~229× the 24h volume of GOHM
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or GOHM?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M and GOHM (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or GOHM?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and GOHM (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and GOHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CHIP at +1.73% and GOHM at −0.64%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs METACCHIP vs BEMFLUID vs CHIPAUDIO vs CHIPGOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.