Open app

TRUMAN vs GOHM — price, size and safety, side by side

TRUMAN (BNB Chain) vs GOHM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.

TRUMANB

$0.002582
Truman World on BNB Chain
Trade TRUMAN
vs

GOHMC

$5.53K
Governance OHM on Avalanche
Trade GOHM

TRUMAN vs GOHM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21

100 — shared start
TRUMAN 0.00%  ·  GOHM 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
TRUMANGOHM
Price$0.002582$5.53K
Market cap$846.90K—
24h volume$5.69M$3.54K
Liquidity$116.64K$116.22K
FDV$2.66M$3.42M
Holders2,1797,457
Age (days)21,758
Safety gradeBC

Where they differ

What the data says

TRUMAN

TRUMAN — Truman World — is a two-day-old BNB Chain token at 0xabffa443547b34ab6c3b3173d26e233900527777, priced at a $846.9 thousand market cap across 2,179 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.

The contract is locked — no mint, no pause, no blacklist, verified source — and the float is reasonably spread at 21.9% in the top ten. The tape is the hot part: $116.6 thousand of tracked liquidity churning nearly fifty times over on $5.7 million of two-day volume — a launch window running at full tilt.

Full TRUMAN safety read →

GOHM

GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.

The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.

Full GOHM safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, TRUMAN or GOHM?

By tracked market cap: TRUMAN (BNB Chain) measures $846.90K and GOHM (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, TRUMAN or GOHM?

On the contract checks we publish: TRUMAN (BNB Chain) grades B and GOHM (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have TRUMAN and GOHM performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show TRUMAN at 0.00% and GOHM at 0.00%.

More comparisons

FRIC vs TRUMANTRUMAN vs XERISCHIP vs TRUMANTRUMAN vs KOHAIGOHM vs XERISGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHMCHIP vs GOHM

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.