Host143 vs NADS — price, size and safety, side by side
143 (Monad) vs NADS (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
143 vs NADS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 143 | NADS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003587 | $0.00003777 |
| Market cap | $41.30K | $35.08K |
| 24h volume | $513.70 | $90.68 |
| Liquidity | $9.46K | $8.44K |
| FDV | $41.30K | $35.08K |
| Holders | 1,507 | 3,459 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 143 measures ~5.7× the 24h volume of NADS
- NADS measures ~2.3× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window 143 moved −14.4% while NADS moved +7.67%
What the data says
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
NADS
The contract behind NADS is about as reassuring as they come. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's why NADS sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-09-26 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Here's where NADS stands today: a $8.44K pool, a holder base of 3,459 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $8.44K pool stands up well to a ~$35.08K cap — depth like that means NADS absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 3,459 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 143 or NADS?
By tracked market cap: 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K and NADS (Monad) measures $35.08K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 143 or NADS?
On the contract checks we publish: 143 (Monad) grades A and NADS (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 143 and NADS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 143 at −14.4% and NADS at +7.67%.
More comparisons
CUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143HELIO vs NADSNADS vs YELPENADS vs HACKERBORGY vs NADS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.