HostXMR vs SWARMS — price, size and safety, side by side
XMR (Solana) vs SWARMS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
XMR vs SWARMS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| XMR | SWARMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $552.87 | $0.008364 |
| Market cap | $1.37M | $8.47M |
| 24h volume | $6.26M | $201.18K |
| Liquidity | $822.67K | $819.41K |
| FDV | $1.37M | $8.47M |
| Holders | 30,285 | 28,874 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SWARMS measures ~6.2× the market cap of XMR
- XMR measures ~31× the 24h volume of SWARMS
- over the shared window XMR moved +2.14% while SWARMS moved +12.0%
What the data says
XMR
Wrapped Monero on Solana — this token, mint WXMRyRZhsa19ety5erZhHg4N3xj3EVN92u94422teJp — is an IOU for XMR, the privacy coin that runs on its own chain and cannot natively exist anywhere else. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $823 thousand of liquidity, a Solana-side value near $1.4 million, and roughly 30,285 holders — a genuinely broad distribution for a wrapped asset.
The thing to understand before anything else: Monero's entire reason to exist is that its ledger is opaque — no block explorer can trace a real XMR. So a "wrapped XMR" on a transparent chain is two things at once: it is the only way to hold Monero price exposure inside Solana DeFi, and it is a token whose backing is fundamentally unverifiable by on-chain inspection — the real XMR sits in someone's custody where you cannot see it.
SWARMS
SWARMS is a Solana AI-agent token — themed on multi-agent frameworks, one of the larger survivors of the agent-token wave. The mint 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump is what our scan tracks: $8.5 million market cap, $819 thousand of liquidity and 28,874 holders as of September 26, 2026 — a genuinely deep pool and a very wide holder base for this cap.
The honest caution is the category's: agent-framework tokens are narrative instruments first — the holders are real, the market is real, and the technology they gesture at is real somewhere, but the value linkage between an open framework and its token is loose at best. What the figures do support is that this market is functional, which the long tail of agent tokens cannot claim.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XMR or SWARMS?
By tracked market cap: XMR (Solana) measures $1.37M and SWARMS (Solana) measures $8.47M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XMR or SWARMS?
On the contract checks we publish: XMR (Solana) grades A and SWARMS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XMR and SWARMS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show XMR at +2.14% and SWARMS at +12.0%.
More comparisons
XMR vs AAPLXMR vs COAIXMR vs IDLCBXRP vs XMRAAPL vs SWARMSSWARMS vs COAISWARMS vs IDLSWARMS vs ACT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.