HostSWARMS vs IDL — price, size and safety, side by side
SWARMS (Solana) vs IDL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SWARMS vs IDL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| SWARMS | IDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008364 | $0.3502 |
| Market cap | $8.47M | $5.77M |
| 24h volume | $201.18K | $18.62K |
| Liquidity | $819.41K | $812.80K |
| FDV | $8.47M | $6.81M |
| Holders | 28,874 | 19,837 |
| Age (days) | — | 312 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SWARMS measures ~11× the 24h volume of IDL
What the data says
SWARMS
SWARMS is a Solana AI-agent token — themed on multi-agent frameworks, one of the larger survivors of the agent-token wave. The mint 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump is what our scan tracks: $8.5 million market cap, $819 thousand of liquidity and 28,874 holders as of September 26, 2026 — a genuinely deep pool and a very wide holder base for this cap.
The honest caution is the category's: agent-framework tokens are narrative instruments first — the holders are real, the market is real, and the technology they gesture at is real somewhere, but the value linkage between an open framework and its token is loose at best. What the figures do support is that this market is functional, which the long tail of agent tokens cannot claim.
IDL
IDL — InfinityDAO — is a 312-day-old Polygon token at 0x4c18406fa690faa53e5efa899a971557251af72d, priced at a $5.8 million market cap on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The venue read is the strong side: $812.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is healthy against the cap — a book deep enough that normal hands can enter and leave without moving the mark hard. The unmeasured side is the caveat: contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, and holder distribution was not resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWARMS or IDL?
By tracked market cap: SWARMS (Solana) measures $8.47M and IDL (Polygon) measures $5.77M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWARMS or IDL?
On the contract checks we publish: SWARMS (Solana) grades A and IDL (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWARMS and IDL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show SWARMS at +1.71% and IDL at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AAPL vs SWARMSXMR vs SWARMSSWARMS vs COAISWARMS vs ACTCOAI vs IDLIDL vs ACTIDL vs GEODAAPL vs IDL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.