HostAAPL vs SWARMS — price, size and safety, side by side
AAPL (Base) vs SWARMS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
AAPL vs SWARMS — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AAPL | SWARMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $340.18 | $0.008364 |
| Market cap | $2.09M | $8.47M |
| 24h volume | $3.59M | $201.18K |
| Liquidity | $822.53K | $819.41K |
| FDV | $2.11M | $8.47M |
| Holders | 3,385 | 28,874 |
| Age (days) | 39 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SWARMS measures ~4.1× the market cap of AAPL
- AAPL measures ~18× the 24h volume of SWARMS
- SWARMS measures ~8.5× the holder count of AAPL
- over the shared window AAPL moved +1.46% while SWARMS moved +12.2%
What the data says
AAPL
AAPL on Base — 0xb200000000000000000000c2e324d24d7eecd1fb — trades as a tokenized Apple share: $335.28 at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, $823 thousand of liquidity, roughly $10.3 million of daily volume.
It shares its issuer's vanity prefix — 0xb200… — with the GOOGLC contract indexed beside it, marking a family of tokenized-equity wrappers from one deployer. Everything that makes these instruments legible also makes them fragile: the on-chain half is verifiable — a $823 thousand pool, real volume, a price tracking the stock — and the off-chain half is not. No block explorer can confirm shares held at a custodian; that claim lives in the issuer's attestations, if any exist.
SWARMS
SWARMS is a Solana AI-agent token — themed on multi-agent frameworks, one of the larger survivors of the agent-token wave. The mint 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump is what our scan tracks: $8.5 million market cap, $819 thousand of liquidity and 28,874 holders as of September 26, 2026 — a genuinely deep pool and a very wide holder base for this cap.
The honest caution is the category's: agent-framework tokens are narrative instruments first — the holders are real, the market is real, and the technology they gesture at is real somewhere, but the value linkage between an open framework and its token is loose at best. What the figures do support is that this market is functional, which the long tail of agent tokens cannot claim.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AAPL or SWARMS?
By tracked market cap: AAPL (Base) measures $2.09M and SWARMS (Solana) measures $8.47M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AAPL or SWARMS?
On the contract checks we publish: AAPL (Base) grades B and SWARMS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AAPL and SWARMS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AAPL at +1.46% and SWARMS at +12.2%.
More comparisons
XMR vs AAPLAAPL vs COAIAAPL vs IDLCBXRP vs AAPLXMR vs SWARMSSWARMS vs COAISWARMS vs IDLSWARMS vs ACT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.