HostWPOL vs JLP — price, size and safety, side by side
WPOL (Polygon) vs JLP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WPOL vs JLP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WPOL | JLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1211 | $4.90 |
| Market cap | $22.12M | $946.26M |
| 24h volume | $8.14M | $13.23M |
| Liquidity | $7.27M | $6.77M |
| FDV | $22.15M | $946.26M |
| Holders | 843,463 | 89,741 |
| Age (days) | 1,687 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JLP measures ~43× the market cap of WPOL
- JLP measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of WPOL
- WPOL measures ~9.4× the holder count of JLP
- over the shared window WPOL moved +8.33% while JLP moved +0.43%
What the data says
WPOL
WPOL at 0x0d500b1d8e8ef31e21c99d1db9a6444d3adf1270 is the gas token's wrapped twin — the ERC-20 face of POL on its own chain, the contract long-timers knew as WMATIC before the token migration renamed what it wraps. One POL in, one WPOL out; the wrapper exists because DeFi needs an ERC-20 and the gas token is not one.
The September 27, 2026 snapshot is as clean as this index prints: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A, on a wrapper whose entire job is to be boring. 843,463 wallets hold it; the market cap reads $22.1 million across 206.7 million wrapped units, and $7.3 million of tracked depth is deep for that size. Daily turnover of $16.1 million is the sound of plumbing doing work — a gas wrapper trades constantly because everything routes through it.
JLP
JLP is not a normal token and should not be read like one: it is the liquidity-provider share of Jupiter's perpetuals exchange — a claim on a managed basket of SOL, ETH, wBTC and stablecoins that serves as the counterparty to every trader on the venue. The September 26, 2026 snapshot values the deployment at roughly $946 million across 89,741 holders on mint 27G8MtK7VtTcCHkpASjSDdkWWYfoqT6ggEuKidVJidD4 — the largest asset on this page's list after the platform tokens.
Both authority flags read unconfirmed in this snapshot, and for once that is close to inevitable: a pool share mints when liquidity is deposited and burns when it is withdrawn, so live mint machinery — program-held — is the design. The honest statement remains "unresolved in this read, verify live," and the scanner above does exactly that; what a holder is actually trusting is the Jupiter perps program, not an SPL switch.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WPOL or JLP?
By tracked market cap: WPOL (Polygon) measures $22.12M and JLP (Solana) measures $946.26M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WPOL or JLP?
On the contract checks we publish: WPOL (Polygon) grades A and JLP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WPOL and JLP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WPOL at +8.33% and JLP at +0.43%.
More comparisons
SPX vs WPOLWPOL vs WIFWPOL vs FARTCOINCASH vs WPOLJLP vs ZORAJLP vs BONKFARTCOIN vs JLPWIF vs JLP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.