HostWIF vs JLP — price, size and safety, side by side
WIF (Solana) vs JLP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WIF vs JLP — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WIF | JLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2448 | $4.90 |
| Market cap | $244.95M | $946.26M |
| 24h volume | $1.74M | $13.23M |
| Liquidity | $7.21M | $6.77M |
| FDV | $244.95M | $946.26M |
| Holders | 264,567 | 89,741 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JLP measures ~3.9× the market cap of WIF
- JLP measures ~7.6× the 24h volume of WIF
- WIF measures ~2.9× the holder count of JLP
What the data says
WIF
dogwifhat is a picture of a dog wearing a hat, and it is worth being precise about that, because $WIF's entire honest pitch is that there is no other pitch. No roadmap, no utility claims, no yield — just one of the strongest brands the 2023–24 memecoin cycle produced. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot, that brand is priced at roughly $245.0 million of market capitalization, spread across 264,567 holders at mint EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm.
For a token with no team promises to audit, the on-chain mechanics are the whole due-diligence surface, and WIF's are clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, and the creator-associated wallet holding a share the snapshot rounds to zero. Nobody can print supply into your position, nobody can freeze your balance mid-exit, and no deployer sits on a stash waiting for your entry. Those are precisely the levers pulled in the launches our obituaries section documents, and their absence is what separates a volatile joke from a trap.
JLP
JLP is not a normal token and should not be read like one: it is the liquidity-provider share of Jupiter's perpetuals exchange — a claim on a managed basket of SOL, ETH, wBTC and stablecoins that serves as the counterparty to every trader on the venue. The September 26, 2026 snapshot values the deployment at roughly $946 million across 89,741 holders on mint 27G8MtK7VtTcCHkpASjSDdkWWYfoqT6ggEuKidVJidD4 — the largest asset on this page's list after the platform tokens.
Both authority flags read unconfirmed in this snapshot, and for once that is close to inevitable: a pool share mints when liquidity is deposited and burns when it is withdrawn, so live mint machinery — program-held — is the design. The honest statement remains "unresolved in this read, verify live," and the scanner above does exactly that; what a holder is actually trusting is the Jupiter perps program, not an SPL switch.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WIF or JLP?
By tracked market cap: WIF (Solana) measures $244.95M and JLP (Solana) measures $946.26M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WIF or JLP?
On the contract checks we publish: WIF (Solana) grades A and JLP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WIF and JLP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WIF at +12.0% and JLP at +10.2%.
More comparisons
WPOL vs WIFSPX vs WIFWIF vs FARTCOINCASH vs WIFJLP vs ZORAJLP vs BONKFARTCOIN vs JLPWPOL vs JLP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.