HostWPOL vs WIF — price, size and safety, side by side
WPOL (Polygon) vs WIF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WPOL vs WIF — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WPOL | WIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1211 | $0.2448 |
| Market cap | $22.12M | $244.95M |
| 24h volume | $8.14M | $1.74M |
| Liquidity | $7.27M | $7.21M |
| FDV | $22.15M | $244.95M |
| Holders | 843,463 | 264,567 |
| Age (days) | 1,687 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- WIF measures ~11× the market cap of WPOL
- WPOL measures ~4.7× the 24h volume of WIF
- WPOL measures ~3.2× the holder count of WIF
What the data says
WPOL
WPOL at 0x0d500b1d8e8ef31e21c99d1db9a6444d3adf1270 is the gas token's wrapped twin — the ERC-20 face of POL on its own chain, the contract long-timers knew as WMATIC before the token migration renamed what it wraps. One POL in, one WPOL out; the wrapper exists because DeFi needs an ERC-20 and the gas token is not one.
The September 27, 2026 snapshot is as clean as this index prints: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A, on a wrapper whose entire job is to be boring. 843,463 wallets hold it; the market cap reads $22.1 million across 206.7 million wrapped units, and $7.3 million of tracked depth is deep for that size. Daily turnover of $16.1 million is the sound of plumbing doing work — a gas wrapper trades constantly because everything routes through it.
WIF
dogwifhat is a picture of a dog wearing a hat, and it is worth being precise about that, because $WIF's entire honest pitch is that there is no other pitch. No roadmap, no utility claims, no yield — just one of the strongest brands the 2023–24 memecoin cycle produced. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot, that brand is priced at roughly $245.0 million of market capitalization, spread across 264,567 holders at mint EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm.
For a token with no team promises to audit, the on-chain mechanics are the whole due-diligence surface, and WIF's are clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, and the creator-associated wallet holding a share the snapshot rounds to zero. Nobody can print supply into your position, nobody can freeze your balance mid-exit, and no deployer sits on a stash waiting for your entry. Those are precisely the levers pulled in the launches our obituaries section documents, and their absence is what separates a volatile joke from a trap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WPOL or WIF?
By tracked market cap: WPOL (Polygon) measures $22.12M and WIF (Solana) measures $244.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WPOL or WIF?
On the contract checks we publish: WPOL (Polygon) grades A and WIF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WPOL and WIF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WPOL at +8.33% and WIF at +3.36%.
More comparisons
SPX vs WPOLWPOL vs FARTCOINCASH vs WPOLPRIME vs WPOLSPX vs WIFWIF vs FARTCOINCASH vs WIFWIF vs JLP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.