HostWBTC.E vs AUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC.E (Avalanche) vs AUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WBTC.E vs AUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WBTC.E | AUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.90K | $0.9994 |
| Market cap | $26.68M | $234.29M |
| 24h volume | $33.51K | $322.55K |
| Liquidity | $391.40K | $2.82M |
| FDV | $26.68M | $162.22M |
| Holders | 8,989 | 10,320 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 300 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AUSD measures ~8.8× the market cap of WBTC.E
- AUSD measures ~7.2× the liquidity of WBTC.E
- AUSD measures ~9.6× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
What the data says
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $26.7 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $391.4 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
AUSD
AUSD is Agora's institutional dollar — a stablecoin built for treasury-grade backing (State Street custodian, VanEck management) that targets the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD. The deployment 0x00000000efe302beaa2b3e6e1b18d08d69a9012a is the Monad deployment — the same multichain address AUSD uses on every chain it lands on; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AUSD competes on custody pedigree rather than yield gimmicks — which means its risk profile is the boring kind (issuer solvency, attestation cadence, redemption terms) that is easier to verify but no smaller for being verifiable. AUSD also exists on Solana under a different mint; this Monad deployment carries the same canonical multichain address as its siblings.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC.E or AUSD?
By tracked market cap: WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $26.68M and AUSD (Monad) measures $234.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC.E or AUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B and AUSD (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC.E and AUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC.E at +0.30% and AUSD at −0.00%.
More comparisons
ZCAT vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs XHYPEMCDX vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs GEODUB vs AUSDAUSD vs SOLAUSD vs MSETHNPC vs AUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.