HostUVM vs QUID — price, size and safety, side by side
UVM (Polygon) vs QUID (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
UVM vs QUID — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| UVM | QUID | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3952 | $0.07183 |
| Market cap | $766.92M | $10.28M |
| 24h volume | $7.02K | $534.41K |
| Liquidity | $440.27K | $436.06K |
| FDV | $712.87M | $71.83M |
| Holders | 2,858 | 14,990 |
| Age (days) | 601 | 16 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UVM measures ~75× the market cap of QUID
- QUID measures ~76× the 24h volume of UVM
- QUID measures ~5.2× the holder count of UVM
What the data says
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the September 27, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UVM or QUID?
By tracked market cap: UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M and QUID (Base) measures $10.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UVM or QUID?
On the contract checks we publish: UVM (Polygon) grades A and QUID (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UVM and QUID performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show UVM at 0.00% and QUID at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RENBTC vs UVMUVM vs VOLLARUVM vs APXUSDDADDY vs UVMQUID vs GMEXAPXUSD vs QUIDVOLLAR vs QUIDRENBTC vs QUID
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.