HostRENBTC vs QUID — price, size and safety, side by side
RENBTC (Polygon) vs QUID (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RENBTC vs QUID — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RENBTC | QUID | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.88K | $0.07183 |
| Market cap | $25.27M | $10.28M |
| 24h volume | $13.86K | $534.41K |
| Liquidity | $440.43K | $436.06K |
| FDV | $490.34K | $71.83M |
| Holders | 1,941 | 14,990 |
| Age (days) | 1,333 | 16 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RENBTC measures ~2.5× the market cap of QUID
- QUID measures ~39× the 24h volume of RENBTC
- QUID measures ~7.7× the holder count of RENBTC
- over the shared window RENBTC moved +5.06% while QUID moved +10.8%
What the data says
RENBTC
RENBTC at 0xdbf31df14b66535af65aac99c32e9ea844e14501 is the wrapped-bitcoin claim the Ren bridge issued on Polygon — an asset whose issuing bridge wound down years ago, and whose remains still carry a live page in this index. The September 26, 2026 snapshot's silhouette says the service era ended: a local supply of 6 tokens worth $490.3 thousand fully diluted, against a $25.3 million asset-wide market cap that counts every chain's leftovers.
What remains is a residual book: 1,941 wallets still hold a slice, the ten largest hold 96.7% of supply, and $440.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $13.9 thousand of daily volume. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can still be swapped after deployment, a flag that matters more on an asset whose operator stepped away than on one still maintained.
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the September 27, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENBTC or QUID?
By tracked market cap: RENBTC (Polygon) measures $25.27M and QUID (Base) measures $10.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENBTC or QUID?
On the contract checks we publish: RENBTC (Polygon) grades B and QUID (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENBTC and QUID performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RENBTC at +5.06% and QUID at +10.8%.
More comparisons
RENBTC vs UVMRENBTC vs VOLLARRENBTC vs APXUSDDADDY vs RENBTCQUID vs GMEXAPXUSD vs QUIDVOLLAR vs QUIDUVM vs QUID
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.