HostRENBTC vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side
RENBTC (Polygon) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
RENBTC vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RENBTC | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.88K | $0.3952 |
| Market cap | $25.27M | $766.92M |
| 24h volume | $13.86K | $7.02K |
| Liquidity | $440.43K | $440.27K |
| FDV | $490.34K | $712.87M |
| Holders | 1,941 | 2,858 |
| Age (days) | 1,333 | 601 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UVM measures ~30× the market cap of RENBTC
- RENBTC measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of UVM
What the data says
RENBTC
RENBTC at 0xdbf31df14b66535af65aac99c32e9ea844e14501 is the wrapped-bitcoin claim the Ren bridge issued on Polygon — an asset whose issuing bridge wound down years ago, and whose remains still carry a live page in this index. The September 26, 2026 snapshot's silhouette says the service era ended: a local supply of 6 tokens worth $490.3 thousand fully diluted, against a $25.3 million asset-wide market cap that counts every chain's leftovers.
What remains is a residual book: 1,941 wallets still hold a slice, the ten largest hold 96.7% of supply, and $440.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $13.9 thousand of daily volume. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can still be swapped after deployment, a flag that matters more on an asset whose operator stepped away than on one still maintained.
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENBTC or UVM?
By tracked market cap: RENBTC (Polygon) measures $25.27M and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENBTC or UVM?
On the contract checks we publish: RENBTC (Polygon) grades B and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENBTC and UVM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RENBTC at +5.06% and UVM at +7.17%.
More comparisons
RENBTC vs VOLLARRENBTC vs APXUSDDADDY vs RENBTCRENBTC vs QUIDUVM vs VOLLARUVM vs APXUSDDADDY vs UVMUVM vs QUID
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.