HostUVM vs QUICK — price, size and safety, side by side
UVM (Polygon) vs QUICK (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
UVM vs QUICK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UVM | QUICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3952 | $0.01112 |
| Market cap | $766.92M | $6.31M |
| 24h volume | $7.02K | $19.39K |
| Liquidity | $440.27K | $267.93K |
| FDV | $712.87M | $7.39M |
| Holders | 2,858 | 53,996 |
| Age (days) | 601 | 1,439 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UVM measures ~122× the market cap of QUICK
- UVM measures ~1.6× the liquidity of QUICK
- QUICK measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of UVM
- QUICK measures ~19× the holder count of UVM
- over the shared window UVM moved +7.17% while QUICK moved +16.2%
What the data says
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $6.3 million market cap prices most of the $7.4 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $267.9 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UVM or QUICK?
By tracked market cap: UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M and QUICK (Polygon) measures $6.31M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UVM or QUICK?
On the contract checks we publish: UVM (Polygon) grades A and QUICK (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UVM and QUICK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UVM at +7.17% and QUICK at +16.2%.
More comparisons
RENBTC vs UVMUVM vs VOLLARUVM vs APXUSDDADDY vs UVMBTR vs QUICKQUICK vs INJQUICK vs GMONUSDUC vs QUICK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.