HostUP vs AEON — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs AEON (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
UP vs AEON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UP | AEON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3038 | $0.05778 |
| Market cap | $65.63M | $10.45M |
| 24h volume | $9.52M | $1.37M |
| Liquidity | $897.16K | $844.58K |
| FDV | $274.70M | $55.57M |
| Holders | 9,978 | 52,492 |
| Age (days) | 124 | 57 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- UP measures ~6.3× the market cap of AEON
- UP measures ~7.0× the 24h volume of AEON
- AEON measures ~5.3× the holder count of UP
- over the shared window UP moved −10.5% while AEON moved +3.97%
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $65.6 million market cap against a $274.7 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $897.2 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
AEON
AEON on BNB Chain at 0x277add739c6e0477616948357af9e79fe1ec9b80 is 57 days old at the September 21, 2026 snapshot, and it carries the weakest contract posture in this batch: the snapshot's assessor measures minting as still possible — new supply can be minted — freeze controls still active — balances can be frozen — and a contract owner that is present but hidden. That is the combination this index was built to surface, and the grade lands at D because of it.
The market side reads better than the contract side: $10.4 million of market cap against $55.6 million fully diluted on a 1.0 billion supply, $844.6 thousand of tracked depth that is deep relative to the cap, 52,492 holders, and $1.4 million of 24-hour volume. The ten largest wallets hold 88.4% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or AEON?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $65.63M and AEON (BNB Chain) measures $10.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or AEON?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and AEON (BNB Chain) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and AEON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UP at −10.5% and AEON at +3.97%.
More comparisons
UP vs AAVEVSN vs UPUSDT0 vs UPUP vs FFAEON vs METAXAEON vs PONKERISE vs AEONGOOGLC vs AEON
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.