HostUP vs AAVE — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs AAVE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
UP vs AAVE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UP | AAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3038 | $155.43 |
| Market cap | $65.63M | $2.26B |
| 24h volume | $9.52M | $3.93M |
| Liquidity | $897.16K | $23.28M |
| FDV | $274.70M | $2.34B |
| Holders | 9,978 | 188,683 |
| Age (days) | 124 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- AAVE measures ~34× the market cap of UP
- AAVE measures ~26× the liquidity of UP
- UP measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of AAVE
- AAVE measures ~19× the holder count of UP
- over the shared window UP moved −10.5% while AAVE moved +6.25%
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $65.6 million market cap against a $274.7 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $897.2 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
AAVE
AAVE is the token of DeFi's biggest lending protocol — the asset that secures Aave's safety module and governs the money market that's been clearing loans continuously since ETHLend in 2017. The deployment 0x7fc66500c84a76ad7e9c93437bfc5ac33e2ddae9 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $23.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — thin against a float that trades everywhere.
The honest shape: AAVE's thesis is unusually concrete for a governance token — stakers backstop protocol shortfalls with their own stake, so the token is literally collateral for the system's solvency, which ties its value to Aave's actual revenue and risk book rather than pure governance vibes. That makes it closer to a productive asset than most of this index — with the caveat that "productive" here still means "exposed to one protocol's loan book."
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or AAVE?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $65.63M and AAVE (Ethereum) measures $2.26B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or AAVE?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and AAVE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and AAVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UP at −10.5% and AAVE at +6.25%.
More comparisons
VSN vs UPUSDT0 vs UPUP vs FFFWA vs UPUSD1 vs AAVELINK vs AAVEETH vs AAVESUSDE vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.