HostFWA vs UP — price, size and safety, side by side
FWA (Ethereum) vs UP (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FWA vs UP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| FWA | UP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02003 | $0.3038 |
| Market cap | $19.82M | $65.63M |
| 24h volume | $715.39K | $9.52M |
| Liquidity | $921.21K | $897.16K |
| FDV | $19.43M | $274.70M |
| Holders | 3,498 | 9,978 |
| Age (days) | 67 | 124 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UP measures ~3.3× the market cap of FWA
- UP measures ~13× the 24h volume of FWA
- UP measures ~2.9× the holder count of FWA
- over the shared window FWA moved −0.00% while UP moved −10.9%
What the data says
FWA
FWA on Ethereum — 0xa0df17b5ac76ababa36e1450e2cbcd18a620c845 — calls itself "Fake World Assets", a parody of the RWA (real-world asset) sector, and the name is doing something unusual: it is honest. In a market segment full of tokens claiming to be backed by treasuries, real estate and gold, FWA announces in the name that it is backed by nothing.
The September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $921 thousand of liquidity and roughly $1.7 million of daily volume — turnover near 1.5x, an ordinary active market rather than the churn of the momentum coins. At 32 days it is young but not disposable-aged.
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $65.6 million market cap against a $274.7 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $897.2 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FWA or UP?
By tracked market cap: FWA (Ethereum) measures $19.82M and UP (BNB Chain) measures $65.63M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FWA or UP?
On the contract checks we publish: FWA (Ethereum) grades A and UP (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FWA and UP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show FWA at −0.00% and UP at −10.9%.
More comparisons
PPOLY vs FWAFWA vs USDT0SPCX vs FWAFWA vs VSNUP vs AAVEVSN vs UPUSDT0 vs UPUP vs FF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.