HostFWA vs VSN — price, size and safety, side by side
FWA (Ethereum) vs VSN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FWA vs VSN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| FWA | VSN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02003 | $0.04384 |
| Market cap | $19.82M | $166.29M |
| 24h volume | $715.39K | $61.37K |
| Liquidity | $921.21K | $909.27K |
| FDV | $19.43M | $4.49M |
| Holders | 3,498 | 43,114 |
| Age (days) | 67 | 314 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- VSN measures ~8.4× the market cap of FWA
- FWA measures ~12× the 24h volume of VSN
- VSN measures ~12× the holder count of FWA
What the data says
FWA
FWA on Ethereum — 0xa0df17b5ac76ababa36e1450e2cbcd18a620c845 — calls itself "Fake World Assets", a parody of the RWA (real-world asset) sector, and the name is doing something unusual: it is honest. In a market segment full of tokens claiming to be backed by treasuries, real estate and gold, FWA announces in the name that it is backed by nothing.
The September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $921 thousand of liquidity and roughly $1.7 million of daily volume — turnover near 1.5x, an ordinary active market rather than the churn of the momentum coins. At 32 days it is young but not disposable-aged.
VSN
VSN at 0x6fbbbd8bfb1cd3986b1d05e7861a0f62f87db74b — Vision — is an Arbitrum asset 314 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $166.3 million market cap dwarfs the $4.5 million fully-diluted figure priced on the 101.2 million local units — the familiar shape where the headline valuation lives on another venue while this chain carries a slice.
The local book is thin against that headline: $909.3 thousand of tracked depth on $38.5 thousand of daily volume — a quiet book that does its real clearing elsewhere. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FWA or VSN?
By tracked market cap: FWA (Ethereum) measures $19.82M and VSN (Arbitrum) measures $166.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FWA or VSN?
On the contract checks we publish: FWA (Ethereum) grades A and VSN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FWA and VSN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show FWA at −0.00% and VSN at +0.35%.
More comparisons
PPOLY vs FWAFWA vs USDT0SPCX vs FWATOSHI vs FWAUSDT0 vs VSNVSN vs UPPPOLY vs VSNSPCX vs VSN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.