HostGOOGLC vs AEON — price, size and safety, side by side
GOOGLC (Base) vs AEON (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GOOGLC vs AEON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GOOGLC | AEON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $343.55 | $0.05778 |
| Market cap | $2.15M | $10.45M |
| 24h volume | $3.78M | $1.37M |
| Liquidity | $849.76K | $844.58K |
| FDV | $2.15M | $55.57M |
| Holders | 5,894 | 52,492 |
| Age (days) | 39 | 57 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- AEON measures ~4.9× the market cap of GOOGLC
- GOOGLC measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of AEON
- AEON measures ~8.9× the holder count of GOOGLC
- over the shared window GOOGLC moved −2.33% while AEON moved +3.97%
What the data says
GOOGLC
GOOGLC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000002d0ba3164cc74f58b7 — presents itself as a tokenized Alphabet share: named "Alphabet Inc.", priced at $349.12 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot — tracking the equity — with $850 thousand of liquidity and roughly $12.1 million of daily volume.
The address tells the structural story: this contract and its sibling AAPL share the 0xb200… vanity prefix, meaning one issuer deploys the family. That is the standard shape of a tokenized-equity product — a wrapper claiming to track the stock — and it makes the counterparty question the entire question. A tokenized share is only the issuer's promise that a real share backs it; on-chain data can verify the pool, the transfers, and the price, but never the brokerage account off-chain where the backing supposedly sits.
AEON
AEON on BNB Chain at 0x277add739c6e0477616948357af9e79fe1ec9b80 is 57 days old at the September 21, 2026 snapshot, and it carries the weakest contract posture in this batch: the snapshot's assessor measures minting as still possible — new supply can be minted — freeze controls still active — balances can be frozen — and a contract owner that is present but hidden. That is the combination this index was built to surface, and the grade lands at D because of it.
The market side reads better than the contract side: $10.4 million of market cap against $55.6 million fully diluted on a 1.0 billion supply, $844.6 thousand of tracked depth that is deep relative to the cap, 52,492 holders, and $1.4 million of 24-hour volume. The ten largest wallets hold 88.4% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOOGLC or AEON?
By tracked market cap: GOOGLC (Base) measures $2.15M and AEON (BNB Chain) measures $10.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOOGLC or AEON?
On the contract checks we publish: GOOGLC (Base) grades B and AEON (BNB Chain) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOOGLC and AEON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GOOGLC at −2.33% and AEON at +3.97%.
More comparisons
GOOGLC vs RISELINK vs GOOGLCOPENAI vs GOOGLCSYBTC vs GOOGLCAEON vs METAXAEON vs PONKERISE vs AEONAEON vs CHILLGUY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.