HostUNI vs SOL — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs SOL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
UNI vs SOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UNI | SOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.63 | $121.60 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $70.79B |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $4.48B |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $959.88M |
| FDV | $8.01B | $76.46B |
| Holders | 382,165 | 3,820,662 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SOL measures ~13× the market cap of UNI
- SOL measures ~38× the liquidity of UNI
- SOL measures ~872× the 24h volume of UNI
- SOL measures ~10.0× the holder count of UNI
- over the shared window UNI moved +38.5% while SOL moved +18.1%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
SOL
Wrapped SOL is the one token on this site that is barely a token at all. SOL itself — the coin that pays for every transaction on Solana — is not an SPL token, so any program that expects the SPL standard works with this wrapper instead: one wSOL always represents one SOL, held in a token account you can unwrap back to native SOL at any moment. When a DEX route, a lending pool, or a liquidity pair says "SOL," this mint — So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 — is almost always what it means under the hood.
The safety read here is about as clean as the format allows, and for a structural reason rather than a flattering one. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot both the mint authority and the freeze authority read revoked: nobody can print unbacked wSOL, and nobody can freeze a wallet's balance. That isn't a team making good choices — it's baked into how the wrapper works, which is exactly why wrapped SOL is the reference point other tokens get measured against. The snapshot puts roughly 3.82 million holders on the mint and about $960 million of tracked liquidity, numbers no ordinary SPL token approaches.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or SOL?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and SOL (Solana) measures $70.79B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or SOL?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and SOL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and SOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UNI at +38.5% and SOL at +18.1%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDESOL vs WETHSOL vs WBNBSOL vs USDTSOL vs USDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.