HostUNI vs GNON — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs GNON (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UNI vs GNON — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| UNI | GNON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.76 | $0.0001635 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $154.22K |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $518.77 |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $79.71K |
| FDV | $8.01B | $154.22K |
| Holders | 382,165 | 20,188 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~36,330× the market cap of GNON
- UNI measures ~321× the liquidity of GNON
- UNI measures ~9,899× the 24h volume of GNON
- UNI measures ~19× the holder count of GNON
- over the shared window UNI moved +40.4% while GNON moved +10.2%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
GNON
numogram — GNON — the token attached to an AI-concept project (the "Lumpen Space" / GNON agent-research persona that briefly became the agent-sector's philosophical mascot) — on Solana at mint HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $80 thousand of liquidity and roughly 20,188 holders.
GNON had a genuinely unusual moment — it ran to a massive valuation on the strength of an AI persona and an "agent economy" narrative, and then its own originator publicly detached from it, which is the cleanest possible illustration of persona-token risk: the asset's value was the association, and the association left.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or GNON?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and GNON (Solana) measures $154.22K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or GNON?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and GNON (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and GNON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show UNI at +40.4% and GNON at +10.2%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDETEST vs GNONSUPERCYCLE vs GNONGNON vs SLXGNON vs PM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.