HostUMBRA vs SANC — price, size and safety, side by side
UMBRA (Solana) vs SANC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UMBRA vs SANC — normalized performance, 2026-09-23 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| UMBRA | SANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2533 | $0.06975 |
| Market cap | $2.88M | $26.48M |
| 24h volume | $60.19K | $93.21K |
| Liquidity | $678.77K | $672.30K |
| FDV | $5.69M | $50.97M |
| Holders | 6,166 | 78,424 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SANC measures ~9.2× the market cap of UMBRA
- SANC measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of UMBRA
- SANC measures ~13× the holder count of UMBRA
- over the shared window UMBRA moved +27.8% while SANC moved +50.6%
What the data says
UMBRA
UMBRA is the token of Umbra — a Solana privacy protocol bringing shielded payments to the chain, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its mint's vanity suffix signals. The mint PRVT6TB7uss3FrUd2D9xs2zqDBsa3GbMJMwCQsgmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $679 thousand of liquidity and 6,166 holders as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch relative to cap.
The honest read: privacy on Solana is a real technical niche — Umbra's team includes known Solana builders, and MetaDAO-launched tokens carry the futarchy governance experiment on top of the usual protocol risk. The liquidity here is genuinely strong for this cap, but the regulatory posture around privacy protocols is the external risk no tokenomics can diversify away.
SANC
CLOUD is the token of Sanctum, the protocol that turned Solana's liquid-staking landscape into infrastructure — the machinery behind dozens of the chain's LSTs — distributed to its users in a 2024 airdrop. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $26 million of market capitalization across 78,424 holders on mint CLoUDKc4Ane7HeQcPpE3YHnznRxhMimJ4MyaUqyHFzAu.
Every check this page runs resolves clean and confirmed: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, creator-associated wallet under 0.01% of supply. The governance token's own mechanics carry none of the live-authority machinery its protocol's stake pools necessarily run — CLOUD the token is a fixed-supply, unfreezable asset, graded 100/100 on exactly that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UMBRA or SANC?
By tracked market cap: UMBRA (Solana) measures $2.88M and SANC (Solana) measures $26.48M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UMBRA or SANC?
On the contract checks we publish: UMBRA (Solana) grades A and SANC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UMBRA and SANC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-23 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show UMBRA at +27.8% and SANC at +50.6%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs UMBRAUMBRA vs USDT.EUMBRA vs B3BORG vs UMBRARAIN vs SANCB3 vs SANCUSDT.E vs SANCSANC vs UFD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-23→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.