HostWBTC vs UMBRA — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs UMBRA (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WBTC vs UMBRA — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WBTC | UMBRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.50K | $0.2533 |
| Market cap | $9.81B | $2.88M |
| 24h volume | $35.93M | $60.19K |
| Liquidity | $232.25M | $678.77K |
| FDV | $9.81B | $5.69M |
| Holders | 196,369 | 6,166 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~3,408× the market cap of UMBRA
- WBTC measures ~342× the liquidity of UMBRA
- WBTC measures ~597× the 24h volume of UMBRA
- WBTC measures ~32× the holder count of UMBRA
- over the shared window WBTC moved +8.73% while UMBRA moved +48.2%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $232.2 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
UMBRA
UMBRA is the token of Umbra — a Solana privacy protocol bringing shielded payments to the chain, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its mint's vanity suffix signals. The mint PRVT6TB7uss3FrUd2D9xs2zqDBsa3GbMJMwCQsgmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $679 thousand of liquidity and 6,166 holders as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch relative to cap.
The honest read: privacy on Solana is a real technical niche — Umbra's team includes known Solana builders, and MetaDAO-launched tokens carry the futarchy governance experiment on top of the usual protocol risk. The liquidity here is genuinely strong for this cap, but the regulatory posture around privacy protocols is the external risk no tokenomics can diversify away.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or UMBRA?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.81B and UMBRA (Solana) measures $2.88M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or UMBRA?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and UMBRA (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and UMBRA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +8.73% and UMBRA at +48.2%.
More comparisons
USDC vs WBTCWBTC vs FWWETHWBTC vs CRVUSDWBTC vs SASHIMIUMBRA vs USDT.EUMBRA vs B3BORG vs UMBRAUMBRA vs RAIN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.