HostUMBRA vs USDT.E — price, size and safety, side by side
UMBRA (Solana) vs USDT.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UMBRA vs USDT.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| UMBRA | USDT.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2533 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $2.88M | $17.76M |
| 24h volume | $60.19K | $114.28K |
| Liquidity | $678.77K | $674.80K |
| FDV | $5.69M | $17.76M |
| Holders | 6,166 | 95,481 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,250 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- USDT.E measures ~6.2× the market cap of UMBRA
- USDT.E measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of UMBRA
- USDT.E measures ~15× the holder count of UMBRA
- over the shared window UMBRA moved +28.7% while USDT.E moved −0.04%
What the data says
UMBRA
UMBRA is the token of Umbra — a Solana privacy protocol bringing shielded payments to the chain, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its mint's vanity suffix signals. The mint PRVT6TB7uss3FrUd2D9xs2zqDBsa3GbMJMwCQsgmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $679 thousand of liquidity and 6,166 holders as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch relative to cap.
The honest read: privacy on Solana is a real technical niche — Umbra's team includes known Solana builders, and MetaDAO-launched tokens carry the futarchy governance experiment on top of the usual protocol risk. The liquidity here is genuinely strong for this cap, but the regulatory posture around privacy protocols is the external risk no tokenomics can diversify away.
USDT.E
USDT.e at 0xc7198437980c041c805a1edcba50c1ce5db95118 is the legacy bridged Tether on Avalanche — the Avalanche Bridge's dollar claim that predates the issuer's own deployment on the chain. The native sibling files on its own page in this index at a far younger record; this contract is the elder book, 1,250 days into it at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot prices a $17.8 million market cap on 17.7 million units — the remains of a liquidity base that mostly migrated to the native mint. Tracked depth of $674.8 thousand is workable for that size on $209.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a modest but honest book, the shape a superseded claim settles into.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UMBRA or USDT.E?
By tracked market cap: UMBRA (Solana) measures $2.88M and USDT.E (Avalanche) measures $17.76M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UMBRA or USDT.E?
On the contract checks we publish: UMBRA (Solana) grades A and USDT.E (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UMBRA and USDT.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show UMBRA at +28.7% and USDT.E at −0.04%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs UMBRAUMBRA vs B3BORG vs UMBRAUMBRA vs RAINUSDT.E vs B3USDT.E vs RAINUSDT.E vs SANCWBTC vs USDT.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.