HostUB vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
UB (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
UB vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UB | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1447 | $0.1034 |
| Market cap | $361.75M | $255.30M |
| 24h volume | $1.65M | $6.84M |
| Liquidity | $2.82M | $2.46M |
| FDV | $281.46M | $255.30M |
| Holders | 70,504 | 90,082 |
| Age (days) | 376 | 206 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of UB
- over the shared window UB moved +3.93% while 龙虾 moved −60.1%
What the data says
UB
UB at 0x40b8129b786d766267a7a118cf8c07e31cdb6fde — Unibase — is a BNB Chain asset 376 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $361.7 million market cap against a $281.5 million fully-diluted figure on 1.9 billion units.
The striking measurement is the tape: $16.4 million of 24-hour volume against $2.8 million of thin tracked depth — nearly six times the pool cycles daily, the profile of an asset whose order flow runs through routed venues far more than through this standing book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UB or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: UB (BNB Chain) measures $361.75M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UB or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: UB (BNB Chain) grades A and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UB and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UB at +3.93% and 龙虾 at −60.1%.
More comparisons
UB vs AUSDUB vs SOLUB vs MSETHNPC vs UB龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.